VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > PORTERVILLE DC

PORTERVILLE DC

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
PORTERVILLE DC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City PORTERVILLE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have PORTERVILLE
State attribute explanation CA   vs 7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street 26501 AVENUE 140  
Zip Code 93257  
Phone 5597822355  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

Number of Certified Beds
281  (172.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
79  (12.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
28 % (55.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 10/14/2011  
Fire Survey Date 10/21/2011  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicaid  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicaid
Type of Ownership Government - State  vs 0.9% Nursing Homes USA have Government - State
Located Within a Hospital? Yes  vs 6.4% Nursing Homes USA have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 1  
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 75.2 % 
Staff Information
Number of Residents
79  (12.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 12/08/2011
date Of Correction: 01/18/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
3.9 % (21.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.3 % (11.28 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.5 % (9.33 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 9.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.9 % (38.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
36 % (48.64 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
24 % (59.94 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
3.9 % (21.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
0.4 % (8.82 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.8 % (7.7 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (64.55 % higher than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.3 % (1.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 19.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.4 % (33.13 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (64.47 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
30.3 % (51.14 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
21.1 % (53.65 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %



Scroll To Top

saved