VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > PRAIRIE MISSION RETIREMENT VILLAGE

PRAIRIE MISSION RETIREMENT VILLAGE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
PRAIRIE MISSION RETIREMENT VILLAGE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City SAINT PAUL   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have SAINT PAUL
State attribute explanation KS   vs 2.2% Nursing Homes USA have KS
Street 242 CARROLL ST BOX 1Z  
Zip Code 66771  
Phone 6204492400  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
50  (58.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
44  (47.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
88 % (4.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 6/9/2011  
Fire Survey Date 2/22/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(6.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
44  (47.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.64  (0.13 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.52  (0.32 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.16  (0.43 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.
survey Date: 05/18/2009
date Of Correction: 05/31/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.3 % (2.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.8 % (3.03 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.9 % (11.73 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 17.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10 % (15.02 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.2 % (0.56 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
85.7 % (1.76 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
11.1 % (4.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
26 % (0.61 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.3 % (0.2 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 % (65.98 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5 % (3.5 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.1 % (20.28 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.7 % (6.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (65.62 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
19.6 % (0.26 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
8.3 % (2.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22.6 % (2.16 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
83.7 % (2.26 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
34.6 % (40.15 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved