VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > PRESIDENTIAL PAVILION

PRESIDENTIAL PAVILION

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
PRESIDENTIAL PAVILION VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Chicago  vs 0.6% Nursing Homes USA have Chicago
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 8001 SOUTH WESTERN AVENUE  
Zip Code 60620  
Phone 7734366600  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
328  (219.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
307  (215.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
94 % (10.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/1/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/7/2011  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
16  (8.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
307  (215.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.14  (0.63 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.55  (0.29 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.7  (0.89 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
75.2  (69.71 higher than average)
vs
5.49

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 09/03/2010
date Of Correction: 09/12/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 03/29/2012
date Of Correction: 03/30/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 04/01/2010
date Of Correction: 04/26/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 09/25/2009
date Of Correction: 10/10/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 03/29/2012
date Of Correction: 03/30/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 12/14/2011
date Of Correction: 12/15/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 04/01/2011
date Of Correction: 04/22/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Help And Prepare Each Resident For A Safe And Easy Discharge And Transfer From The Nursing Home.
survey Date: 04/01/2010
date Of Correction: 04/26/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 03/29/2012
date Of Correction: 03/30/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 03/29/2012
date Of Correction: 03/30/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 09/03/2010
date Of Correction: 09/12/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 12/23/2009
date Of Correction: 01/11/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Proper Discharge Planning And Communication, Of The Resident's Health Status And Summary Of The Resident's Stay.
survey Date: 03/29/2012
date Of Correction: 03/30/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 12/14/2011
date Of Correction: 12/15/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.
survey Date: 04/01/2010
date Of Correction: 04/25/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards.
survey Date: 12/14/2011
date Of Correction: 12/15/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 15.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.1 % (10.73 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
2.1 % (42.44 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.8 % (12.83 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.4 % (13.06 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 12.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (15.36 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (16.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
7 % (38.9 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.4 % (15.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.5 % (11.89 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
14.1 % (4.88 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.7 % (6.8 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
2.4 % (40.98 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.4 % (8.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.7 % (8.88 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
14.3 % (5.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.4 % (10.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (18.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (25.25 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.8 % (14.54 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved