VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > PROVIDENCE HOME HEALTH CARE CENTER

PROVIDENCE HOME HEALTH CARE CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
PROVIDENCE HOME HEALTH CARE CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City JASPER   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have JASPER
State attribute explanation IN   vs 3.1% Nursing Homes USA have IN
Street 520 W 9TH ST  
Zip Code 47546  
Phone 8124826603  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
60  (48.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
57  (34.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
95 % (11.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/16/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/28/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Church Related  vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Church related
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(56.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(54.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
18  (10.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
57  (34.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.84  (0.07 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.89  (0.05 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.73  (0.14 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Outside Ventilation Via A Window Or Mechanical Ventilation, Or Both.
survey Date: 11/02/2011
date Of Correction: 12/02/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely.
survey Date: 11/02/2011
date Of Correction: 12/02/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Comfortable And Safe Temperature Levels.
survey Date: 07/25/2011
date Of Correction: 08/24/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 09/01/2010
date Of Correction: 10/18/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 10/18/2010
date Of Correction: 12/13/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 10/18/2010
date Of Correction: 12/13/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 10/18/2010
date Of Correction: 12/13/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 11/09/2011
date Of Correction: 01/04/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 04/14/2011
date Of Correction: 05/14/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 01/04/2012
date Of Correction: 01/30/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 01/04/2012
date Of Correction: 01/30/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 01/04/2012
date Of Correction: 01/30/2012 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 11/09/2011
date Of Correction: 01/04/2012 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 04/14/2011
date Of Correction: 05/14/2011 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 04/14/2011
date Of Correction: 05/14/2011 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 04/14/2011
date Of Correction: 05/14/2011 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 04/14/2011
date Of Correction: 05/14/2011 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Menus Meet The Resident's Nutritional Needs And That There Is A Prepared Menu By Which Nutritious Meals Have Been Planned For The Resident And Followed.
survey Date: 01/04/2012
date Of Correction: 01/30/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
36.4 % (11.31 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 8.1 / 8.8 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.6 % (8.23 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.7 % (27.84 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.7 % (13.93 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.5 % (7.96 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
36.2 % (10.81 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6 % (8.1 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
11.4 % (2.18 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.4 % (6.1 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
13 % (30.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.20 % (8.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.5 % (1.08 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
24.3 % (13.57 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %



Scroll To Top

saved