VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > PROVIDENCE SEWARD MED & CARE CENTER LTC

PROVIDENCE SEWARD MED & CARE CENTER LTC

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
PROVIDENCE SEWARD MED & CARE CENTER LTC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City SEWARD   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have SEWARD
State attribute explanation AK   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have AK
Street 2203  
Zip Code 99664  
Phone 9072245241  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

Number of Certified Beds
40  (68.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
32  (59.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
80 % (3.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/15/2012  
Fire Survey Date 3/16/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Government - City/county  vs 0.5% Nursing Homes USA have Government - City/county
Located Within a Hospital? Yes  vs 6.4% Nursing Homes USA have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils None  vs 3.9% Nursing Homes USA have None
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(53.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(49.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 5  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
32  (59.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/13/2010
date Of Correction: 02/27/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/07/2009
date Of Correction: 06/22/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 03/09/2011
date Of Correction: 04/11/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 03/09/2011
date Of Correction: 04/11/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 01/13/2010
date Of Correction: 02/27/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.7 % (2.13 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
14.4 % (1.23 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
12.9 (55.2) % (0.56 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.2 % (40.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
(43.9 lower than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.2 % (12.32 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.5 % (2.11 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
46.3 % (32.2 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.7 % (1.52 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10 % (1.5 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
31.2 % (12.18 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
13.3 % (2.65 % higher than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
12.2 % (2.62 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.20 % (36.33 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
15.1 % (4.37 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %



Scroll To Top

saved