VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > RALEIGH COURT HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER

RALEIGH COURT HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
RALEIGH COURT HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City ROANOKE   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have ROANOKE
State attribute explanation VA   vs 1.8% Nursing Homes USA have VA
Street 1527 GRANDIN ROAD SOUTHWEST  
Zip Code 24015  
Phone 5403429525  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
108  (16.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
90 % (6.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 10/25/2011  
Fire Survey Date 10/31/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
108  (16.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.75  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.09  (0.25 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.84  (0.25 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1  (5.39 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1  (equals average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 10/25/2011
date Of Correction: 12/06/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 10/25/2011
date Of Correction: 12/06/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 07/20/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 07/20/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 01/25/2011
date Of Correction: 02/28/2011 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.
survey Date: 10/25/2011
date Of Correction: 12/06/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 07/20/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.9 % (5.81 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.3 % (32.65 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22.6 % (5.94 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.1 % (5.48 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
17.4 % (5.57 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.2 % (6.26 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.7 % (19.68 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
30 % (4.98 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.6 % (14.96 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.1 % (15.16 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4 % (14.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.1 % (2.71 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.4 % (23.3 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 19.4:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.3 % (4.92 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.8 % (2.3 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40 % (3.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.4 % (10.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.9 % (2.68 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.4 % (11.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2 % (8.73 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
28.5 % (3.74 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.7 % (17.26 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.2 % (24.45 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
20.1 % (2.76 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved