VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > RECTOR NURSING & REHAB CENTER

RECTOR NURSING & REHAB CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
RECTOR NURSING & REHAB CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City RECTOR   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have RECTOR
State attribute explanation AR   vs 1.5% Nursing Homes USA have AR
Street 1023 HIGHWAY 119  
Zip Code 72461  
Phone 8705951040  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
70  (38.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
48  (43.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
69 % (14.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 2/24/2012  
Fire Survey Date 2/23/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 13  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
48  (43.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.42  (0.35 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.09  (0.25 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.51  (0.08 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.12  (5.37 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.12  (0.02 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/05/2012
date Of Correction: 01/16/2012 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 05/31/2012
date Of Correction: 06/14/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 05/31/2012
date Of Correction: 06/14/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 12/15/2011
date Of Correction: 12/30/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 12/15/2011
date Of Correction: 12/30/2011 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 11/17/2011
date Of Correction: 12/06/2011 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 11/17/2011
date Of Correction: 12/30/2011 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 11/17/2011
date Of Correction: 12/30/2011 

Deficiency #8 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 10/23/2009
date Of Correction: 11/16/2009 

Deficiency #9 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 10/23/2009
date Of Correction: 11/16/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 08/05/2010
date Of Correction: 08/18/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents With Reduced Range Of Motion Get Proper Treatment And Services To Increase Range Of Motion.
survey Date: 04/23/2010
date Of Correction: 05/10/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 04/23/2010
date Of Correction: 05/10/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.5 % (4.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.1 % (28.85 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.7 % (2.88 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
15 % (3.17 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.5 % (10.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.5 % (10.96 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.3 % (26.08 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
7 % (36.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (15.36 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (16.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7 % (8.52 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.9 % (6.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.8 % (21.9 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
39 % (24.9 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.1 % (2.12 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 15.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
48.3 % (4.92 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.4 % (5.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.3 % (5.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7 % (12.86 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6.3 % (32.23 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7 % (3.73 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.3 (79.3) % (1.54 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (18.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
26.4 % (48.35 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved