Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
RECTOR NURSING & REHAB CENTER | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
Staff Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Residents |
48 (43.38 lower than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.42 (0.35 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.77
|
||
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.09 (0.25 higher than average)
|
vs |
0.84
|
||
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.51 (0.08 lower than average)
|
vs |
1.59
|
||
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.12 (5.37 lower than average)
|
vs |
5.49
|
||
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.12 (0.02 higher than average)
|
vs |
0.10
|
Environmental Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 01/05/2012 date Of Correction: 01/16/2012 |
Mistreatment Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 05/31/2012 date Of Correction: 06/14/2012 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 05/31/2012 date Of Correction: 06/14/2012 |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 12/15/2011 date Of Correction: 12/30/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 12/15/2011 date Of Correction: 12/30/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #5 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 11/17/2011 date Of Correction: 12/06/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #6 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 11/17/2011 date Of Correction: 12/30/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #7 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 11/17/2011 date Of Correction: 12/30/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #8 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 10/23/2009 date Of Correction: 11/16/2009 |
||||
Deficiency #9 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 10/23/2009 date Of Correction: 11/16/2009 |
Resident Rights Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident. survey Date: 08/05/2010 date Of Correction: 08/18/2010 |
Quality Care Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents With Reduced Range Of Motion Get Proper Treatment And Services To Increase Range Of Motion. survey Date: 04/23/2010 date Of Correction: 05/10/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 04/23/2010 date Of Correction: 05/10/2010 |
Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
20.5 % (4.59 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.09 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
4.1 % (28.85 % lower than average)
|
vs |
32.95 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
9.7 % (2.88 % lower than average)
|
vs |
12.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
15 % (3.17 % higher than average)
|
vs |
11.83 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
5.5 % (10.13 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.63 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
2.5 % (10.96 % lower than average)
|
vs |
13.46 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
2.3 % (26.08 % lower than average)
|
vs |
28.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
7 % (36.68 % lower than average)
|
vs |
43.68 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
100 % (15.36 % higher than average)
|
vs |
84.64 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
100 % (16.06 % higher than average)
|
vs |
83.94 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
75.2 (29.3 higher than average)
|
vs |
45.90
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
7 % (8.52 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.52 %
|
Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
18.9 % (6.49 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.39 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
1.8 % (21.9 % lower than average)
|
vs |
23.70 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
39 % (24.9 % higher than average)
|
vs |
14.10 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
7.1 % (2.12 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.22 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 15.9:1 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
48.3 % (4.92 % higher than average)
|
vs |
43.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
5.4 % (5.25 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.65 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
4.3 % (5.28 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
7 % (12.86 % lower than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
6.3 % (32.23 % lower than average)
|
vs |
38.53 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
7 % (3.73 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.73 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
26.3 (79.3) % (1.54 % higher than average)
|
vs |
24.76 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
100 % (18.56 % higher than average)
|
vs |
81.44 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
26.4 % (48.35 % lower than average)
|
vs |
74.75 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
|
vs |
17.34 %
|