VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > RECUPERATIVE SERVICES UNIT-HEBREW REHAB CENTER

RECUPERATIVE SERVICES UNIT-HEBREW REHAB CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
RECUPERATIVE SERVICES UNIT-HEBREW REHAB CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Boston  vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have Boston
State attribute explanation MA   vs 2.8% Nursing Homes USA have MA
Street 1200 CENTRE STREET  
Zip Code 2131  
Phone 6173258000  
Overall Star Rating
(1.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
50  (58.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
39  (52.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
78 % (5.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/6/2011  
Fire Survey Date 12/6/2011  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare  vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? Yes  vs 6.4% Nursing Homes USA have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils None  vs 3.9% Nursing Homes USA have None
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(6.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 75.2 % 
Staff Information
Number of Residents
39  (52.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.85  (2.08 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.15  (0.69 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
(1.41 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.67  (4.82 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.67  (0.57 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 06/11/2012
date Of Correction: 06/10/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.8 % (32.15 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.1 % (9.92 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.5 % (10.86 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.2 % (9.26 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.9 % (44 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.6 % (23.1 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.8 % (7.96 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95 % (13.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.8 % (19.05 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.1 % (15.24 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved