VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > RED CLIFFS HEALTH AND REHAB

RED CLIFFS HEALTH AND REHAB

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
RED CLIFFS HEALTH AND REHAB VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City St George  vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have St George
State attribute explanation UT   vs 0.6% Nursing Homes USA have UT
Street 1745 EAST 280 NORTH  
Zip Code 84790  
Phone 4356287770  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
124  (15.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
73  (18.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
59 % (24.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/29/2012  
Fire Survey Date 3/29/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
73  (18.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.66  (0.89 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.24  (0.6 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.9  (0.31 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.12  (5.37 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.12  (0.02 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/17/2011
date Of Correction: 07/10/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/20/2010
date Of Correction: 07/12/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 05/20/2010
date Of Correction: 07/12/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 05/17/2011
date Of Correction: 07/10/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 05/20/2010
date Of Correction: 07/12/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 05/17/2011
date Of Correction: 07/10/2011 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 05/17/2011
date Of Correction: 07/10/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 05/17/2011
date Of Correction: 07/10/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 05/20/2010
date Of Correction: 07/12/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.1 % (0.99 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
29.4 % (12.74 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.8 % (3.78 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.8 % (1.97 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.8 % (13.83 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 10.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
30.9 % (2.52 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.4 % (40.28 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
30 % (4.98 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
50.3 % (34.34 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
54.7 % (29.24 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7 % (13.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.3 % (5.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.1 % (20.6 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
29.5 % (15.4 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.7 % (0.48 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
15.4 % (6.9 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
45.8 % (2.42 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.4 % (9.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 12.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
29 % (9.14 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.3 % (33.23 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4 % (6.73 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
29.2 % (4.44 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
47.7 % (33.74 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
47.5 % (27.25 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
10.4 % (6.94 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved