RED OAK HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	RED OAK	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have RED OAK
State attribute explanation	TX	vs	7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX	compare TX Nursing Homes USA
Street	101 REESE DR
Zip Code	75154
Phone	4695520500
Overall Star Rating	3 (0.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (3)
Health Inspections Star Rating	3 (0.17 higher than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (3)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (3)
Quality Measures Star Rating	3 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (3)
RN Only Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (2)
Number of Certified Beds	144 (35.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (144)
Total Number of Residents	123 (31.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (123)
Percent of Occupied Beds	85 % (1.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (85) %
Health Survey Date	8/11/2011
Fire Survey Date	8/10/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	1 (57.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	1 (55.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	8 (0.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	123 (31.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.51 (0.26 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1 (0.16 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.51 (0.08 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	75.2 (69.71 higher than average)	vs	5.49

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure There Is A Pest Control Program To Prevent/deal With Mice, Insects, Or Other Pests. survey Date: 06/25/2010 date Of Correction: 07/30/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 06/25/2010 date Of Correction: 07/23/2010

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 06/25/2010 date Of Correction: 07/12/2010

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses. survey Date: 05/19/2011 date Of Correction: 05/20/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies And Procedures For Influenza And Pneumococcal Immunizations. survey Date: 06/25/2010 date Of Correction: 07/23/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So. survey Date: 06/25/2010 date Of Correction: 07/16/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 07/09/2009 date Of Correction: Not Available

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way. survey Date: 06/25/2010 date Of Correction: 07/30/2010

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	28 % (2.91 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	5.7 % (10.96 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	1.9 % (10.68 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	10.7:1 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	32.6 % (11.94 % lower than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	0.8 % (14.83 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	14.9-28 % (1.44 % higher than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	3.4 % (24.98 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	0.9 % (42.78 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	40.7 % (15.68 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	92.1 % (7.46 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	91.1 % (7.16 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	5.1 % (10.42 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	29.3 % (3.91 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.9 % (21.8 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	15.3 % (1.2 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	4.9 % (4.32 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	5.9 % (2.6 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	34.8 % (8.58 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	1.8 % (8.85 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	14.5 % (4.92 % higher than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	5.7 % (14.16 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	0.6 % (37.93 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	5.1 % (5.63 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	37.2 % (12.44 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	90 % (8.56 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	95.1 % (20.35 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	16.4 % (0.94 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %