VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > RED ROCK CARE AND REHAB, INC

RED ROCK CARE AND REHAB, INC

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
RED ROCK CARE AND REHAB, INC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City COTTONWOOD   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have COTTONWOOD
State attribute explanation AZ   vs 0.9% Nursing Homes USA have AZ
Street 197 SOUTH WILLARD STREET  
Zip Code 86326  
Phone 9286345548  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
80  (28.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
47  (44.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
59 % (24.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 2/10/2012  
Fire Survey Date 2/16/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 17  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
47  (44.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.49  (0.72 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.22  (0.62 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.71  (0.12 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (5.42 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely.
survey Date: 12/03/2010
date Of Correction: 12/29/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 12/03/2010
date Of Correction: 12/29/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 12/03/2010
date Of Correction: 12/29/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 09/04/2009
date Of Correction: 10/16/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 12/03/2010
date Of Correction: 12/29/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 12/03/2010
date Of Correction: 12/29/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 12/03/2010
date Of Correction: 12/29/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential.
survey Date: 12/03/2010
date Of Correction: 12/29/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Help And Prepare Each Resident For A Safe And Easy Discharge And Transfer From The Nursing Home.
survey Date: 05/22/2009
date Of Correction: 06/12/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.
survey Date: 05/22/2009
date Of Correction: 06/12/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 02/10/2012
date Of Correction: 03/14/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 12/03/2010
date Of Correction: 12/29/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.
survey Date: 12/03/2010
date Of Correction: 12/29/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 12/03/2010
date Of Correction: 12/29/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 09/04/2009
date Of Correction: 10/16/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 05/22/2009
date Of Correction: 06/12/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 05/22/2009
date Of Correction: 06/12/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.6 % (32.35 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
44 % (18.98 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
59.5 % (25.14 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
50 % (33.94 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.9-24 % (8.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.8 % (22.9 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.5 % (11.4 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 % (65.98 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9 % (0.5 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
39.5 % (3.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.4 % (8.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.7 % (2.88 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.1 % (8.76 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.3 % (35.23 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 5.6:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
39.7 % (14.94 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.2 % (10.24 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
62.1 % (12.65 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.20 % (15.14 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved