VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > RED ROSE HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER

RED ROSE HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
RED ROSE HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 2 % 
City CASSVILLE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have CASSVILLE
State attribute explanation MO   vs 3.2% Nursing Homes USA have MO
Street 812 OLD EXETER ROAD  
Zip Code 65625  
Phone 4178472184  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
90  (18.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
44  (47.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
49 % (34.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/10/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/10/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(53.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
44  (47.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.77  (equals average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.4  (0.44 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.17  (0.42 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.15  (5.34 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.15  (0.05 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 10/14/2010
date Of Correction: 11/13/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 04/26/2012
date Of Correction: 06/12/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 10/14/2010
date Of Correction: 11/13/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 08/13/2009
date Of Correction: 09/04/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 04/26/2012
date Of Correction: 06/12/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 10/14/2010
date Of Correction: 11/13/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 08/23/2010
date Of Correction: 10/14/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 08/13/2009
date Of Correction: 09/04/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 08/13/2009
date Of Correction: 09/04/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.9 (55.2) % (12.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6 % (26.95 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.5 % (21.88 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
12.5 % (31.18 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20 % (5.02 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
38.6 % (46.04 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
12.5 % (71.44 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1 % (12.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.4 % (16.99 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.1 % (21.6 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.2 % (3.9 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.8 % (2.42 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 8.1 / 8.8 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
12.5 % (30.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.2 % (9.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (65.62 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.7 % (17.16 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained 12.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 7.9:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.5 % (4.26 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
54.8 % (26.64 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
12.2 % (62.55 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
17.2 % (0.14 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved