VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > REGENCY PLACE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER

REGENCY PLACE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
REGENCY PLACE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City BATON ROUGE   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have BATON ROUGE
State attribute explanation LA   vs 1.8% Nursing Homes USA have LA
Street 14333 OLD HAMMOND HWY.  
Zip Code 70816  
Phone 2252721401  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
90  (1.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
75 % (8.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 1/12/2012  
Fire Survey Date 1/12/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Limited Liability Company  vs 1.1% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Limited liability company
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(54.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
26  (18.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
90  (1.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.47  (0.3 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.98  (0.14 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.45  (0.14 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (5.47 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (0.08 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure There Is A Pest Control Program To Prevent/deal With Mice, Insects, Or Other Pests.
survey Date: 07/07/2011
date Of Correction: 07/15/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 09/01/2010
date Of Correction: 09/21/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/06/2010
date Of Correction: 06/14/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/08/2010
date Of Correction: 07/02/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 05/06/2010
date Of Correction: 06/04/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 03/08/2012
date Of Correction: 04/09/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Follow Policies And Procedures To Convey The Resident's Personal Funds To The Appropriate Party Responsible After The Resident's Death.
survey Date: 09/01/2010
date Of Correction: 09/21/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 05/06/2010
date Of Correction: 06/14/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.
survey Date: 07/30/2009
date Of Correction: 09/01/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 04/05/2011
date Of Correction: 04/24/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 05/06/2010
date Of Correction: 06/14/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 05/06/2010
date Of Correction: 06/04/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 04/08/2010
date Of Correction: 06/04/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 04/08/2010
date Of Correction: 07/02/2010 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 10/21/2009
date Of Correction: 12/05/2009 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 10/21/2009
date Of Correction: 12/05/2009 

Deficiency #8 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 07/30/2009
date Of Correction: 09/01/2009 

Deficiency #9 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 07/30/2009
date Of Correction: 09/01/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 03/08/2012
date Of Correction: 04/09/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 09/08/2011
date Of Correction: 09/26/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 09/01/2010
date Of Correction: 09/21/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 05/06/2010
date Of Correction: 06/14/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 04/08/2010
date Of Correction: 06/04/2010 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Doctors Visit Residents Regularly, As Required.
survey Date: 10/21/2009
date Of Correction: 12/05/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 05/06/2010
date Of Correction: 06/04/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs.
survey Date: 10/21/2009
date Of Correction: 12/05/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.8 (82.0) % (2.71 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.9 % (31.05 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.2 % (10.54 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.3 % (3.28 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.7 % (7.13 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.1 % (17.44 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7 % (8.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.3 % (11.16 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.3 % (41.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
80 % (4.64 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
83.8 % (0.14 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.3 % (13.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
26.8 % (1.41 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.3 % (20.4 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
31.9 % (17.8 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.5 % (0.28 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.6 % (0.9 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
31.3 % (12.08 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
8.8 % (1.85 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.3 % (3.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.3 % (18.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.5 % (35.03 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.9 % (6.83 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26 % (1.24 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.7 % (4.74 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
72 % (2.75 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
11.3 % (6.04 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved