RENAISSANCE AT HILLSIDE | comparical.com

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

RENAISSANCE AT HILLSIDE

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	Hillside	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have Hillside
State attribute explanation	IL	vs	5% Nursing Homes USA have IL	compare IL Nursing Homes USA
Street	4600 NORTH FRONTAGE ROAD
Zip Code	60162
Phone	7085449933
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	2 (0.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (2)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (2)
Quality Measures Star Rating	2 (1.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (2)
RN Only Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (4)
Number of Certified Beds	198 (89.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (198)
Total Number of Residents	177 (85.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (177)
Percent of Occupied Beds	89 % (5.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (89) %
Health Survey Date	4/13/2012
Fire Survey Date	4/13/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	2 (56.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	2 (54.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	16 (8.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	177 (85.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.75 (0.02 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.66 (0.18 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.41 (0.18 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.03 (5.46 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.03 (0.07 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 02/28/2012 date Of Correction: 04/30/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 07/08/2010 date Of Correction: 07/29/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 12/09/2009 date Of Correction: 12/29/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 10/22/2009 date Of Correction: 12/09/2009

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 09/14/2011 date Of Correction: 09/20/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others. survey Date: 10/22/2009 date Of Correction: 12/09/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 02/28/2012 date Of Correction: 03/09/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident. survey Date: 12/09/2009 date Of Correction: 12/29/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 02/28/2012 date Of Correction: 03/09/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 04/21/2011 date Of Correction: 04/27/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 01/21/2011 date Of Correction: 02/11/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 11/03/2010 date Of Correction: 11/23/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 10/22/2009 date Of Correction: 12/09/2009
Deficiency #6		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 06/22/2009 date Of Correction: 07/08/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 09/14/2011 date Of Correction: 09/20/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Doctors Visit Residents Regularly, As Required. survey Date: 01/21/2011 date Of Correction: 02/11/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	18.8 % (6.29 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2.3 % (30.65 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	8.4 % (8.26 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	6.9 % (5.68 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	1.3 % (10.53 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	31.9 % (12.64 % lower than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.1 % (11.53 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	7.7 % (5.76 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	2.6 / 3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	10.8 % (32.88 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	15.2 % (9.82 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	21.1 % (63.54 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	13.5 % (70.44 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.3 % (14.22 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	17.1:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2.4 % (21.3 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	10.5 % (3.6 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	8.8 % (0.42 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	1.1 % (7.4 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	31.2 % (12.18 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.3 % (6.35 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	10.1:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	2.3 % (17.56 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	15.2 % (23.33 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.9 % (8.83 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	16.4 % (8.36 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	13.9 / 15.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	12 % (62.75 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	11.8:1 %