RENAISSANCE AT MIDWAY, THE

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	Chicago	vs	0.6% Nursing Homes USA have Chicago
State attribute explanation	IL	vs	5% Nursing Homes USA have IL	compare IL Nursing Homes USA
Street	4437 SOUTH CICERO
Zip Code	60632
Phone	7738840484
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	1 (2.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (1)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	1 (2.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (1)
Number of Certified Beds	249 (140.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (249)
Total Number of Residents	215 (123.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (215)
Percent of Occupied Beds	86 % (2.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (86) %
Health Survey Date	4/20/2012
Fire Survey Date	4/24/2012
Sprinkler Status	Partially Sprinklered	vs	8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	23 (15.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	215 (123.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.31 (0.46 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.56 (0.28 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.87 (0.72 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.08 (5.41 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.08 (0.02 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 02/24/2012 date Of Correction: 03/20/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment. survey Date: 09/23/2010 date Of Correction: 10/11/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 04/02/2009 date Of Correction: 04/03/2009

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 04/20/2012 date Of Correction: 05/21/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 02/24/2012 date Of Correction: 03/20/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 02/24/2012 date Of Correction: 03/20/2012
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others. survey Date: 05/27/2011 date Of Correction: 06/17/2011

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 02/24/2012 date Of Correction: 03/20/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly. survey Date: 05/27/2011 date Of Correction: 06/17/2011

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 04/20/2012 date Of Correction: 05/21/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 02/24/2012 date Of Correction: 03/20/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 11/10/2011 date Of Correction: 12/01/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 11/10/2011 date Of Correction: 12/01/2011
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 11/10/2011 date Of Correction: 12/01/2011
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible. survey Date: 09/23/2010 date Of Correction: 10/11/2010
Deficiency #7		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 04/29/2010 date Of Correction: 05/14/2010
Deficiency #8		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Activities To Meet The Interests And Needs Of Each Resident. survey Date: 02/19/2010 date Of Correction: 03/11/2010
Deficiency #9		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 12/16/2009 date Of Correction: 12/31/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 02/24/2012 date Of Correction: 03/20/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 03/25/2011 date Of Correction: 04/24/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That All Needed Doctor Visits Are Made Personally By A Doctor, As Required. After Initial Doctor Visit, Care May Be Alternated By A Physician Assistant (pa) Or Nurse Practitioner (np). survey Date: 12/16/2009 date Of Correction: 12/31/2009

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Prepare Food That Is Nutritional, Appetizing, Tasty, Attractive, Well-cooked, And At The Right Temperature. survey Date: 03/25/2011 date Of Correction: 04/24/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way. survey Date: 09/29/2009 date Of Correction: 10/01/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	23 % (2.09 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.6 % (32.35 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	3.8 % (12.86 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	12.3:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	5.9 % (5.93 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	38.7 % (5.84 % lower than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.4 % (13.23 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	4.7 % (8.76 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	0.6 % (27.78 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	13.8 % (11.22 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	24.8 % (59.84 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	22.2:1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	0.6 % (14.92 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	21.3 % (4.09 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2.1 % (21.6 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	2.3 % (11.8 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	11.9 % (2.68 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	4 % (4.5 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	37.1 % (6.28 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	3.2 % (7.45 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	3.8 % (5.78 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	0.2 % (19.66 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	0.6 % (37.93 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	0.9 % (9.83 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	13 % (11.76 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	29 % (52.44 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	28.3 % (46.45 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	17.5 % (0.16 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %