REST HAVEN CONVALESCENT AND RETIREMENT HOME

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	SEDALIA	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have SEDALIA
State attribute explanation	MO	vs	3.2% Nursing Homes USA have MO	compare MO Nursing Homes USA
Street	1800 SOUTH INGRAM
Zip Code	65301
Phone	6608270845
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	1 (2.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (1)
RN Only Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (3)
Number of Certified Beds	86 (22.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (86)
Total Number of Residents	58 (33.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (58)
Percent of Occupied Beds	67 % (16.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (67) %
Health Survey Date	2/3/2012
Fire Survey Date	2/3/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicaid	vs	3.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicaid	compare Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Individual	vs	3.5% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Individual	compare For profit - Individual Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	11 (3.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	58 (33.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.42 (0.35 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.67 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.09 (0.5 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.1 (5.39 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.1 (equals average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 08/10/2011 date Of Correction: 09/15/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 11/11/2010 date Of Correction: 12/02/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services. survey Date: 02/01/2010 date Of Correction: 03/23/2010

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 02/01/2010 date Of Correction: 03/23/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 10/20/2009 date Of Correction: 11/27/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident. survey Date: 11/17/2011 date Of Correction: 12/27/2011

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 07/30/2010 date Of Correction: 08/20/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 12/22/2009 date Of Correction: 02/03/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 05/19/2009 date Of Correction: 05/28/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 07/30/2010 date Of Correction: 08/20/2010

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards. survey Date: 10/20/2009 date Of Correction: 11/27/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	25.9 % (0.81 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	28.6 % (11.94 % higher than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	9.4 / 10.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	7.5 % (8.13 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	3.6 % (24.78 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	7.3 % (36.38 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	7.3 % (8.22 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	21.5 % (3.89 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	7.4 % (16.3 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	29.4 % (15.3 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	7.4 % (1.82 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	8.8 % (0.3 % higher than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	25.5 % (17.88 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	7.4 % (3.25 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	2 % (7.58 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	4.7 % (15.16 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	7.3 % (31.23 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	23.3 % (12.57 % higher than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	52.8 % (28.04 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	45 % (36.44 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	6.9 % (67.85 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %