VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > RESTHAVEN LIVING CENTER

RESTHAVEN LIVING CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
RESTHAVEN LIVING CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City BOGALUSA   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have BOGALUSA
State attribute explanation LA   vs 1.8% Nursing Homes USA have LA
Street 1301 HARRISON STREET  
Zip Code 70427  
Phone 9857323909  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
164  (55.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
102  (10.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
62 % (21.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/1/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/28/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
102  (10.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.67  (0.1 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.96  (0.12 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.63  (0.04 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (5.42 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 06/04/2010
date Of Correction: 07/19/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 06/04/2010
date Of Correction: 07/19/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 02/02/2011
date Of Correction: 03/17/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 10/28/2010
date Of Correction: 12/06/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration.
survey Date: 09/28/2010
date Of Correction: 10/28/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 06/04/2010
date Of Correction: 07/19/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 01/20/2010
date Of Correction: 03/01/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Review The Work Of Each Nurse Aide Every Year; And 2) Give Regular In-service Training Based Upon These Reviews.
survey Date: 06/04/2010
date Of Correction: 07/19/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.3 % (2.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.7 % (27.25 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 9.4 / 10.4 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.3 % (4.28 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.4 % (7.43 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
38.3 % (6.24 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.7 % (13.93 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 9.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.20 % (41.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
29.8 % (4.78 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
65.6 % (19.04 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
63.1 % (20.84 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 10.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.3 % (11.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.2 % (0.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.7 % (19 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11 % (3.1 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 9.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.1 % (1.4 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.3 % (11.08 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.1 % (8.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10.4 % (0.82 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
8.4 % (30.13 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8 % (8.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
29.2 % (4.44 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
70 % (11.44 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
69.1 % (5.65 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
6.4 % (10.94 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved