VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > RETAMA MANOR NURSING CENTER/WESLACO

RETAMA MANOR NURSING CENTER/WESLACO

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
RETAMA MANOR NURSING CENTER/WESLACO VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City WESLACO   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have WESLACO
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 721 AIRPORT DR  
Zip Code 78596  
Phone 9569688502  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
60  (48.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
60  (31.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
100 % (16.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 9/21/2011  
Fire Survey Date 9/20/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
60  (31.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.35  (0.42 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.9  (0.06 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.25  (0.34 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 06/08/2010
date Of Correction: 06/25/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 12/30/2009
date Of Correction: 02/16/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 02/25/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 03/09/2010
date Of Correction: 04/09/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 02/25/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 02/25/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Set Up A Group That Is Legally Responsible For Writing And Setting Up Policies For Leading And Running The Nursing Home; Or 2) Hire A Properly Licensed Administrator.
survey Date: 03/09/2010
date Of Correction: 03/15/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
33.3 % (8.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (58.54 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.8 % (5.78 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.3 % (8.53 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
54.3 % (9.76 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3 % (12.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5 % (8.46 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.7 % (2.68 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
56.7 % (27.94 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
60 % (23.94 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.5 % (9.02 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
36.3 % (10.91 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5 % (9.1 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
14.5 % (5.28 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.5 % (5 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
56.4 % (13.02 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.2 % (5.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.8 % (3.78 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.1 % (37.43 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.3 % (4.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
29.1 % (4.34 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
62.4 % (19.04 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
58.4 % (16.35 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 13.9 / 15.3 % 


Scroll To Top

saved