RIMROCK VILLA CONV HOSPITAL

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	BARSTOW	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have BARSTOW
State attribute explanation	CA	vs	7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street	27555 RIMROCK ROAD
Zip Code	92311
Phone	7602522515
Overall Star Rating	3 (0.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (3)
Health Inspections Star Rating	3 (0.17 higher than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (3)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (2)
Quality Measures Star Rating	2 (1.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (2)
RN Only Star Rating	1 (2.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (1)
Number of Certified Beds	59 (49.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (59)
Total Number of Residents	56 (35.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (56)
Percent of Occupied Beds	95 % (11.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (95) %
Health Survey Date	10/13/2011
Fire Survey Date	10/20/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	19 (11.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	56 (35.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.38 (0.39 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.73 (0.89 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	2.11 (0.52 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.2 (5.29 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.2 (0.1 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 07/14/2009 date Of Correction: 08/17/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Maintain Comfortable Sound Levels. survey Date: 07/14/2009 date Of Correction: 08/17/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment. survey Date: 07/14/2009 date Of Correction: 08/17/2009

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 07/14/2009 date Of Correction: 08/17/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident. survey Date: 07/14/2009 date Of Correction: 08/17/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident. survey Date: 07/14/2009 date Of Correction: 08/17/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential. survey Date: 07/14/2009 date Of Correction: 08/17/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Routine And 24-hour Emergency Dental Care For Each Resident. survey Date: 07/14/2009 date Of Correction: 08/17/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 07/14/2009 date Of Correction: 08/17/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life. survey Date: 07/14/2009 date Of Correction: 08/17/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Check And Assess Each Resident's Assessment At Least Every 3 Months. survey Date: 07/14/2009 date Of Correction: 08/17/2009

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Train All Employees On What To Do In An Emergency, And Carry Out Announced Staff Drills. survey Date: 07/14/2009 date Of Correction: 08/17/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 07/14/2009 date Of Correction: 08/17/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Complete, Dated Lab Records In The Resident's File. survey Date: 07/14/2009 date Of Correction: 08/17/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Quickly Tell The Resident's Doctor The Results Of Lab Tests. survey Date: 07/14/2009 date Of Correction: 08/17/2009
Deficiency #5		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 07/14/2009 date Of Correction: 08/17/2009

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: At Least Once A Month, Have A Licensed Pharmacist Review Each Resident's Medication(s) And Report Any Irregularities To The Attending Doctor. survey Date: 07/14/2009 date Of Correction: 08/17/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being. survey Date: 07/14/2009 date Of Correction: 08/17/2009

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way. survey Date: 07/14/2009 date Of Correction: 08/17/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	5.3 % (19.79 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	3.3 % (29.65 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	13.9 / 15.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.7 % (12.93 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	93.5 % (8.86 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	96.1 % (12.16 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	3.6 % (42.3 % lower than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	5.3 % (10.22 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	6.9 % (18.49 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2.3 % (21.4 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	12.8:1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	10.8 % (1.58 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	13.9 / 15.3 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	56.2 % (12.82 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.7 % (7.95 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	5.7 % (3.88 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	0.8 % (19.06 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1.6 % (36.93 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	5.5 % (5.23 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	37.3 % (12.54 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	94.1 % (12.66 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	94.7 % (19.95 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	8.3 % (9.04 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %