VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > RIPLEY CROSSING

RIPLEY CROSSING

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
RIPLEY CROSSING VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City MILAN   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have MILAN
State attribute explanation IN   vs 3.1% Nursing Homes USA have IN
Street 1200 WHITLATCH WAY  
Zip Code 47031  
Phone 8126542231  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
100  (8.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
95  (3.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
95 % (11.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 6/17/2011  
Fire Survey Date 6/15/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
95  (3.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.73  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.72  (0.12 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.44  (0.15 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (5.42 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 01/18/2012
date Of Correction: 02/01/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 10/06/2011
date Of Correction: 10/20/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 10/06/2011
date Of Correction: 10/20/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 10/13/2009
date Of Correction: 11/02/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 10/13/2009
date Of Correction: 11/02/2009 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.
survey Date: 01/18/2012
date Of Correction: 02/01/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 01/18/2012
date Of Correction: 02/01/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 10/06/2011
date Of Correction: 10/20/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 10/13/2009
date Of Correction: 11/01/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.4 % (0.69 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (58.54 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.8 % (7.78 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.7 % (8.13 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
14.1 % (1.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13.6-28 % (0.14 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6 % (37.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 18.2:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.9 % (10.26 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
91 % (7.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.6 % (11.92 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.3 % (1.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.50 % (22.2 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.8 % (12.3 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.8 % (6.42 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.4 % (6.1 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
28.4 % (14.98 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
10.6 % (0.05 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
14.5 % (4.92 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.1 % (33.43 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6 % (9.13 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.6 (65.5) % (6.16 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95 % (13.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.8 % (19.05 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
27.4 % (10.06 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved