RIVER'S BEND RETIREMENT COMMUNITY

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	KUTTAWA	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have KUTTAWA
State attribute explanation	KY	vs	1.8% Nursing Homes USA have KY	compare KY Nursing Homes USA
Street	300 BEECH ST.
Zip Code	42055
Phone	2703882868
Overall Star Rating	3 (0.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (3)
Health Inspections Star Rating	4 (1.17 higher than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (4)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	1 (2.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (1)
RN Only Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (4)
Number of Certified Beds	40 (68.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (40)
Total Number of Residents	38 (53.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (38)
Percent of Occupied Beds	95 % (11.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (95) %
Health Survey Date	12/16/2011
Fire Survey Date	12/15/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	Non Profit - Corporation	vs	18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation	compare Non profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	18 (10.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	38 (53.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.72 (0.05 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.42 (0.42 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.14 (0.45 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.01 (5.48 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.01 (0.09 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 06/22/2011 date Of Correction: 08/05/2011

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 09/16/2010 date Of Correction: 10/20/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 08/12/2009 date Of Correction: 09/20/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment. survey Date: 06/05/2009 date Of Correction: 07/16/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 09/30/2011 date Of Correction: 11/10/2011

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 06/22/2011 date Of Correction: 08/05/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 02/17/2010 date Of Correction: 04/01/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 06/05/2009 date Of Correction: 07/16/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 06/05/2009 date Of Correction: 07/16/2009
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 06/05/2009 date Of Correction: 07/16/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 06/05/2009 date Of Correction: 07/16/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional. survey Date: 06/05/2009 date Of Correction: 07/16/2009

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 09/30/2011 date Of Correction: 11/10/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Clinical Record Information Safe, So That It Will Not Be Lost, Destroyed Or Used By The Wrong Person. survey Date: 06/05/2009 date Of Correction: 07/16/2009

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors. survey Date: 02/17/2010 date Of Correction: 04/01/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards. survey Date: 04/28/2009 date Of Correction: 06/01/2009

Automatic Sprinkler Systems Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Automatic Sprinkler Systems That Have Been Maintained In Working Order. survey Date: 08/03/2011 date Of Correction: 09/16/2011

Emergency Plans and Fire Drills Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Record Of Quarterly Fire Drills For Each Shift Under Varying Conditions. survey Date: 08/03/2011 date Of Correction: 09/16/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	19.4:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	13.2 % (3.46 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	75.2 % (63.37 % higher than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	5.7 % (7.76 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	11.1 % (17.28 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	2.8 % (40.88 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	13.9 / 15.3 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	18.9 % (6.49 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	5.3 % (18.4 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	15.3 % (1.2 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	11 % (1.78 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	1 % (7.5 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	34.4 % (8.98 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.20 % (8.45 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	2.9 % (6.68 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	10.4 % (9.46 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1.9 % (36.63 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	12.3:1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	45.7 % (20.94 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	53.8 % (20.95 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %