VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > RIVIERA PALMS REHABILITATION CENTER

RIVIERA PALMS REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
RIVIERA PALMS REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City PALMETTO   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have PALMETTO
State attribute explanation FL   vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL
Street 926 HABEN BLVD  
Zip Code 34221  
Phone 9417220553  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
111  (19.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
93 % (9.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/24/2012  
Fire Survey Date 5/30/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(56.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(54.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 9  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
111  (19.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.28  (0.49 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.08  (0.24 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.35  (0.24 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (5.46 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/13/2012
date Of Correction: 02/07/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure There Is A Pest Control Program To Prevent/deal With Mice, Insects, Or Other Pests.
survey Date: 07/20/2010
date Of Correction: 08/20/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 09/18/2009
date Of Correction: 10/18/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 06/08/2010
date Of Correction: 07/08/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Help And Prepare Each Resident For A Safe And Easy Discharge And Transfer From The Nursing Home.
survey Date: 06/08/2010
date Of Correction: 07/08/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 06/08/2010
date Of Correction: 07/08/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 06/08/2010
date Of Correction: 07/08/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 01/05/2010
date Of Correction: 02/05/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.
survey Date: 11/22/2011
date Of Correction: 12/20/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.3 % (0.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.9 % (31.05 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.2 % (9.46 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.8 % (3.78 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.1 % (4.73 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
55.8 % (11.26 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.3 % (14.33 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.4 % (11.06 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.3 % (21.08 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6.9 % (36.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.7 % (3.32 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.8 % (12.16 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.4 % (13.46 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.20 % (43.7 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.7 % (9.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23 % (2.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.7 % (21 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.7 % (7.4 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.7 % (2.52 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.6 % (1.1 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
51.3 % (7.92 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.4 % (10.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.6 % (4.98 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.4 % (13.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6.9 % (31.63 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.5 % (4.23 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.4 % (0.36 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.1 % (14.66 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.4 % (22.65 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
13.2 % (4.14 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved