VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > ROCHELLE REHAB & HEALTH CARE CENTER

ROCHELLE REHAB & HEALTH CARE CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
ROCHELLE REHAB & HEALTH CARE CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City ROCHELLE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have ROCHELLE
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 900 NORTH 3RD STREET  
Zip Code 61068  
Phone 8155624111  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
50  (58.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
41  (50.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
82 % (1.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 2/2/2012  
Fire Survey Date 2/9/2012  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Individual  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Individual
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
41  (50.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.4  (0.37 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.67  (0.17 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.07  (0.52 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.14  (5.35 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.14  (0.04 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely.
survey Date: 05/23/2012
date Of Correction: 06/08/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/23/2012
date Of Correction: 06/08/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 01/06/2011
date Of Correction: 01/12/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Tell The Resident Or The Resident's Representative In Writing How Long The Nursing Home Will Hold The Resident's Bed.
survey Date: 09/09/2011
date Of Correction: 09/09/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Let The Resident Or The Resident's Legal Representative The Right To Access Or Purchase Copies Of All Records.
survey Date: 09/09/2011
date Of Correction: 09/09/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 05/18/2011
date Of Correction: 05/20/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration.
survey Date: 08/20/2009
date Of Correction: 09/18/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 08/20/2009
date Of Correction: 09/18/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 7.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.4 % (30.55 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
34.2 % (22.37 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
15.8 % (2.34 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.3 % (38.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.4 % (19.62 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (15.36 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (16.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 2.6 / 3 % 
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.7 % (9.69 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.3 % (20.4 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.8 % (8.3 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
11.3 % (2.08 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
32.4 (90.3) % (23.9 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.7 % (8.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.9 % (4.75 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13 % (3.42 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.5 % (33.03 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
8.2 % (2.53 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.9 % (13.86 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (18.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.3 % (24.55 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.20 % (15.14 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved