Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
ROCKVILLE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
Staff Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Residents |
36 (55.38 lower than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.99 (0.22 higher than average)
|
vs |
0.77
|
||
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.87 (0.03 higher than average)
|
vs |
0.84
|
||
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.85 (0.26 higher than average)
|
vs |
1.59
|
||
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.16 (5.33 lower than average)
|
vs |
5.49
|
||
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.16 (0.06 higher than average)
|
vs |
0.10
|
Resident Rights Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 05/12/2011 date Of Correction: 06/11/2011 |
Quality Care Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life. survey Date: 05/12/2011 date Of Correction: 06/11/2011 |
Resident Assessment Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 05/12/2011 date Of Correction: 06/11/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 05/12/2011 date Of Correction: 06/11/2011 |
Administration Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 05/12/2011 date Of Correction: 06/11/2011 |
Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
75.2 % (63.37 % higher than average)
|
vs |
11.83 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
|
vs |
15.63 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
|
vs |
13.46 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
|
vs |
28.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
|
vs |
43.68 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
|
vs |
15.52 %
|
Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
39.3 % (13.91 % higher than average)
|
vs |
25.39 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
2.9 % (20.8 % lower than average)
|
vs |
23.70 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
6.5 % (7.6 % lower than average)
|
vs |
14.10 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers | 12.1:1 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
8.5 % (equals average)
|
vs |
8.50 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
48.6 % (5.22 % higher than average)
|
vs |
43.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
1.3 % (9.35 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.65 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
75.2 % (65.62 % higher than average)
|
vs |
9.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
|
vs |
38.53 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
26.5 % (15.77 % higher than average)
|
vs |
10.73 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
8.7 % (16.06 % lower than average)
|
vs |
24.76 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
96.4 % (14.96 % higher than average)
|
vs |
81.44 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
80.4 % (5.65 % higher than average)
|
vs |
74.75 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
3.8 % (13.54 % lower than average)
|
vs |
17.34 %
|