ROSEVILLE POINT HEALTH & WELLNESS CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	ROSEVILLE	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have ROSEVILLE
State attribute explanation	CA	vs	7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street	600 SUNRISE AVENUE
Zip Code	95661
Phone	9167823131
Overall Star Rating	3 (0.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (3)
Health Inspections Star Rating	2 (0.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (2)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (4)
Number of Certified Beds	98 (10.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (98)
Total Number of Residents	80 (11.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (80)
Percent of Occupied Beds	82 % (1.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (82) %
Health Survey Date	5/17/2012
Fire Survey Date	5/16/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	12

Staff Information
Number of Residents	80 (11.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.85 (0.08 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.79 (0.05 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.64 (0.05 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.17 (5.32 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.17 (0.07 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Limit The Charges Against The Personal Funds Of A Resident For Items Or Services For Which Payment Is Made Under Medicare Or Medicaid. survey Date: 04/16/2012 date Of Correction: 05/04/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Limit The Charges Against The Personal Funds Of A Resident For Items Or Services For Which Payment Is Made Under Medicare Or Medicaid. survey Date: 04/16/2012 date Of Correction: 05/04/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Limit The Charges Against The Personal Funds Of A Resident For Items Or Services For Which Payment Is Made Under Medicare Or Medicaid. survey Date: 04/16/2012 date Of Correction: 05/04/2012
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Limit The Charges Against The Personal Funds Of A Resident For Items Or Services For Which Payment Is Made Under Medicare Or Medicaid. survey Date: 04/16/2012 date Of Correction: 05/04/2012
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Limit The Charges Against The Personal Funds Of A Resident For Items Or Services For Which Payment Is Made Under Medicare Or Medicaid. survey Date: 04/16/2012 date Of Correction: 05/04/2012
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Limit The Charges Against The Personal Funds Of A Resident For Items Or Services For Which Payment Is Made Under Medicare Or Medicaid. survey Date: 04/16/2012 date Of Correction: 05/04/2012

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible. survey Date: 05/03/2012 date Of Correction: 05/09/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible. survey Date: 05/03/2012 date Of Correction: 05/09/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible. survey Date: 05/03/2012 date Of Correction: 05/09/2012
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible. survey Date: 05/03/2012 date Of Correction: 05/09/2012
Deficiency #5		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible. survey Date: 05/03/2012 date Of Correction: 05/09/2012
Deficiency #6		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible. survey Date: 05/03/2012 date Of Correction: 05/09/2012

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	16.1 % (8.99 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	3.9 % (12.76 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	6.3 % (6.28 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	9.8 % (2.03 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	9.7 % (5.93 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	8.2 % (5.26 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	1.6 % (26.78 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1.6 % (42.08 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	2.20 % (22.82 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	89.2 % (4.56 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	90.8 % (6.86 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.6 % (13.92 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	21.4 % (3.99 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.6 % (23.1 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	6.5 % (7.6 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	6.1 % (3.12 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	13.6-28 % (5.1 % higher than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	50.6 % (7.22 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	9.2 % (1.45 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	12.1:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	2.5 % (17.36 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	0.5 - 2.0 % (38.03 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	0.5 - 2.0 % (10.23 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	7.3 % (17.46 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	86.2 % (4.76 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	89.5 % (14.75 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	0.5 - 2.0 % (16.84 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %