VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > ROYAL OAK NURSING CENTER

ROYAL OAK NURSING CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
ROYAL OAK NURSING CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City DADE CITY   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have DADE CITY
State attribute explanation FL   vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL
Street 37300 ROYAL OAK LANE  
Zip Code 33525  
Phone 3525673122  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
105  (13.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
88 % (4.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/17/2012  
Fire Survey Date 5/22/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Other  vs 1.9% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Other
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(56.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(54.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 8  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
105  (13.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.4  (0.37 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.98  (0.14 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.38  (0.21 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11  (5.38 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11  (0.01 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 11/04/2011
date Of Correction: 12/04/2011 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 08/11/2011
date Of Correction: 09/11/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 08/11/2011
date Of Correction: 09/11/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 12/17/2010
date Of Correction: 01/17/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 12/17/2010
date Of Correction: 01/17/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 12/17/2010
date Of Correction: 01/17/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 12/17/2010
date Of Correction: 01/17/2011 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 12/17/2010
date Of Correction: 01/17/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28 % (2.91 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.3 % (2.36 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.5 % (9.08 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.3 % (6.53 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.9 % (9.64 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7 % (8.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.3 % (9.16 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.2 % (25.18 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.3 % (38.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 16.3:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
67 % (17.64 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
65 % (18.94 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1 % (13.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
29.1 % (3.71 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.4-2413.6-24 % (1.7 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5 % (4.22 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.4 % (1.1 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
38.5 % (4.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.6 % (4.05 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.9 % (4.68 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.4 % (17.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
6.3 % (32.23 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1 % (8.63 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 21.2:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
72.8 % (8.64 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
68.6 % (6.15 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.9 % (12.44 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved