VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > SACRED HEART HOME

SACRED HEART HOME

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
SACRED HEART HOME VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 75.2 % 
City Chicago  vs 0.6% Nursing Homes USA have Chicago
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 1550 SOUTH ALBANY  
Zip Code 60623  
Phone 7732776868  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
172  (63.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
128  (36.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
74 % (9.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 4/12/2012  
Fire Survey Date 4/10/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicaid  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
128  (36.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.29  (0.48 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.38  (0.46 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.67  (0.92 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
75.2  (69.71 higher than average)
vs
5.49

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/07/2009
date Of Correction: 06/05/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/24/2009
date Of Correction: 06/01/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 04/24/2009
date Of Correction: 06/01/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 12/13/2011
date Of Correction: 01/06/2012 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 05/07/2009
date Of Correction: 06/05/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 12/13/2011
date Of Correction: 01/06/2012 

Fire Alarm Systems Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: An Approved Installation, Maintenance And Testing Program For Fire Alarm Systems.
survey Date: 02/01/2010
date Of Correction: 02/12/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.6 % (16.06 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.7 % (9.13 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
75.2 % (30.66 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 10.3:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.4 % (12.76 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.8 % (14.86 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
94.1 % (68.71 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.9 % (13.2 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
75.2 % (31.82 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (64.55 % higher than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (65.62 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (64.47 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.1 % (20.66 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.9 % (17.46 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
75.2 % (0.45 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %



Scroll To Top

saved