VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > SAFE HAVEN CARE CENTER OF POCATELLO

SAFE HAVEN CARE CENTER OF POCATELLO

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
SAFE HAVEN CARE CENTER OF POCATELLO VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 1 % 
City POCATELLO   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have POCATELLO
State attribute explanation ID   vs 0.6% Nursing Homes USA have ID
Street 1200 HOSPITAL WAY  
Zip Code 83201  
Phone 2082322570  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
84  (24.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
64  (27.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
76 % (7.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 6/24/2011  
Fire Survey Date 5/10/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? Yes  vs 6.4% Nursing Homes USA have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(54.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 8  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
67  (24.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 03/15/2011
date Of Correction: 04/05/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/04/2011
date Of Correction: 02/28/2011 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 01/04/2011
date Of Correction: 02/28/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 10/26/2010
date Of Correction: 11/30/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 01/04/2011
date Of Correction: 02/28/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.
survey Date: 01/04/2011
date Of Correction: 02/28/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs.
survey Date: 01/04/2011
date Of Correction: 02/28/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 01/04/2011
date Of Correction: 02/28/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
61 % (35.91 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5 % (27.95 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.9 % (9.76 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.3 % (3.53 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
9 % (6.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.7 % (1.76 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
52.5 % (24.12 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.6 % (42.08 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
54.1 % (30.54 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
48.6 % (35.34 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3 % (12.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
64.8 % (39.41 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3 % (20.7 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.4 % (2.3 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.2 % (1.7 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
57.1 % (13.72 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.8 % (2.85 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
12.5 % (2.92 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
55.3 % (35.44 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.7 % (36.83 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.20 % (8.53 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
38.6 % (13.84 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
52.9 % (28.54 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
36.4 % (38.35 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
15.6 % (1.74 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved