VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > SAGE VIEW CARE CENTER

SAGE VIEW CARE CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
SAGE VIEW CARE CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City ROCK SPRINGS   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have ROCK SPRINGS
State attribute explanation WY   vs 0.3% Nursing Homes USA have WY
Street 1325 SAGE STREET  
Zip Code 82901  
Phone 3073623780  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
101  (7.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
60  (31.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
59 % (24.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/29/2012  
Fire Survey Date 3/27/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
12  (4.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
60  (31.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.77  (equals average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.45  (0.39 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.22  (0.37 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (5.47 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (0.08 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 03/29/2012
date Of Correction: 05/13/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 03/29/2012
date Of Correction: 05/13/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 03/17/2011
date Of Correction: 04/30/2011 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 03/29/2012
date Of Correction: 05/13/2012 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 03/29/2012
date Of Correction: 05/13/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 03/17/2011
date Of Correction: 04/30/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 03/17/2011
date Of Correction: 04/30/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 03/17/2011
date Of Correction: 04/30/2011 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 03/17/2011
date Of Correction: 04/30/2011 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 03/17/2011
date Of Correction: 04/30/2011 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 02/11/2010
date Of Correction: 03/28/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.
survey Date: 03/17/2011
date Of Correction: 04/30/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13 % (12.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.3 % (3.64 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
13.3 % (0.72 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
15.8 % (3.97 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7 % (6.46 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.7 % (41.98 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
44.2 % (19.18 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
82.5 % (2.14 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
73.5 % (10.44 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7 % (13.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.3 % (12.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.2 % (20.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
19.2 % (5.1 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
13.8 % (4.58 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11 % (2.5 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.3 % (10.08 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.20 % (8.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.7 % (4.88 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.7 % (36.83 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7 % (9.03 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
46.6 % (21.84 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.3 % (0.14 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
61 % (13.75 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
20.3 % (2.96 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved