VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > SANCTA MARIA NURSING FACILITY

SANCTA MARIA NURSING FACILITY

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
SANCTA MARIA NURSING FACILITY VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Cambridge  vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have Cambridge
State attribute explanation MA   vs 2.8% Nursing Homes USA have MA
Street 799 CONCORD AVENUE  
Zip Code 2138  
Phone 6178682200  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
141  (32.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
138  (46.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
98 % (14.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 9/22/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/2/2011  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
138  (46.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.75  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.97  (0.13 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.72  (0.13 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11  (5.38 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11  (0.01 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/28/2011
date Of Correction: 06/28/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Notice To The Resident Before A Room Or Roommate Change.
survey Date: 08/30/2011
date Of Correction: 10/26/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Tell The Resident Or The Resident's Representative In Writing How Long The Nursing Home Will Hold The Resident's Bed.
survey Date: 08/30/2011
date Of Correction: 10/26/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give The Resident's Representative The Ability To Exercise The Resident's Rights.
survey Date: 08/30/2011
date Of Correction: 10/26/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 05/05/2009
date Of Correction: 06/15/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 05/05/2009
date Of Correction: 06/15/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 08/01/2011
date Of Correction: 10/16/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 05/05/2009
date Of Correction: 06/15/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.2 % (8.89 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.3 % (31.65 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.6 % (7.06 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.4 % (7.18 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.7 % (7.13 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
43.3 % (1.24 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.1 % (13.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.7 % (8.76 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.9 % (25.48 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.1 % (1.08 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
84.4 % (0.24 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
82 % (1.94 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.5 % (43.4 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.7 % (11.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16 % (9.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.9 % (22.8 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.5 % (7.6 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.5 % (3.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.4 % (3.1 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
53.2 % (9.82 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.50 % (9.15 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.8 % (0.22 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.50 % (18.36 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.3 % (38.23 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5 % (5.73 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.3 % (0.46 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
64.5 % (16.94 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
76.6 % (1.85 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 12.3:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved