VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > SANCTUARY AT THE ABBEY

SANCTUARY AT THE ABBEY

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
SANCTUARY AT THE ABBEY VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City WARREN   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have WARREN
State attribute explanation MI   vs 2.8% Nursing Homes USA have MI
Street 12250 E 12 MILE RD  
Zip Code 48093  
Phone 5867516200  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
200  (91.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
170  (78.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
85 % (1.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/18/2012  
Fire Survey Date 5/18/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(55.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(53.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
14  (6.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
170  (78.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.69  (0.08 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.49  (0.35 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.18  (0.41 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (5.43 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/31/2012
date Of Correction: 07/06/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 03/27/2012
date Of Correction: 04/13/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/07/2011
date Of Correction: 04/08/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/27/2009
date Of Correction: 06/10/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 12/01/2011
date Of Correction: 12/19/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Has The Right To Have A Choice Over Activities, Their Schedules And Health Care According To His Or Her Interests, Assessment, And Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 05/31/2012
date Of Correction: 07/06/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 04/14/2010
date Of Correction: 05/21/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 03/27/2012
date Of Correction: 04/13/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Specialized Rehabilitative Services That Are Medically Necessary By Qualified Personnel, When Ordered By A Doctor.
survey Date: 08/06/2010
date Of Correction: 08/23/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 04/14/2010
date Of Correction: 05/21/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 09/25/2009
date Of Correction: 10/16/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 09/25/2009
date Of Correction: 10/16/2009 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 04/27/2009
date Of Correction: 06/10/2009 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 09/25/2009
date Of Correction: 10/16/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.2-20 % (13.89 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4 % (28.95 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (58.54 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.4 % (6.18 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.8 % (6.03 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
58 % (13.46 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.1 % (12.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.4 % (7.06 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.7 % (27.68 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (50.18 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
84.5 % (0.14 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
91.1 % (7.16 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4 % (14.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.4-2413.6-24 % (12.99 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.7 % (21 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (61.1 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.4 % (2.82 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6 % (2.5 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
56.8 % (13.42 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.1 % (7.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9 % (0.58 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.7 % (19.16 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.7 % (37.83 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.3 % (8.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.9 % (23.86 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
88 % (6.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
88.5 % (13.75 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.1 % (14.24 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved