VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > SENECA PLACE

SENECA PLACE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
SENECA PLACE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City VERONA   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have VERONA
State attribute explanation PA   vs 4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA
Street 5360 SALTSBURG ROAD  
Zip Code 15147  
Phone 4127988000  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
174  (65.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
164  (72.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
94 % (10.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 4/13/2012  
Fire Survey Date 4/25/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
164  (72.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.79  (0.02 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.14  (0.3 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.93  (0.34 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1  (5.39 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1  (equals average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 08/04/2011
date Of Correction: 08/17/2011 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 07/13/2011
date Of Correction: 08/18/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 02/11/2010
date Of Correction: 03/30/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Treatment/services To Not Only Continue, But Improve The Ability To Care For Themselves.
survey Date: 02/15/2012
date Of Correction: 04/06/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 02/15/2012
date Of Correction: 04/06/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 09/15/2011
date Of Correction: 10/21/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 05/19/2010
date Of Correction: 06/18/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 08/04/2011
date Of Correction: 08/17/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.8 % (6.29 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.50 % (31.45 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.7 (69.3) % (4.04 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.6 % (10.98 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.4 % (1.57 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
72.9 % (28.36 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
10.2 % (5.43 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.5 % (8.96 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.7 % (24.68 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
32.9 % (7.88 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
77.8 % (6.84 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
83.4 % (0.54 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.20 % (13.32 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.8 % (5.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.8 % (21.9 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.3 % (10.2 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.7 % (3.52 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.4 % (1.9 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
74.7 % (31.32 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.6 % (3.05 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.5 % (6.08 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.5 % (16.36 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1 % (37.53 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7 % (9.03 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
29.8 % (5.04 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
75.1 % (6.34 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
80.3 % (5.55 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
19.9 % (2.56 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved