Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
SHELBY NURSING CENTER | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
Staff Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Residents |
161 (69.62 higher than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.51 (0.26 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.77
|
||
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.37 (0.53 higher than average)
|
vs |
0.84
|
||
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.88 (0.29 higher than average)
|
vs |
1.59
|
||
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.42 (5.07 lower than average)
|
vs |
5.49
|
||
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.42 (0.32 higher than average)
|
vs |
0.10
|
Environmental Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 11/16/2011 date Of Correction: 12/05/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 09/21/2010 date Of Correction: 10/15/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 04/05/2010 date Of Correction: 04/26/2010 |
Resident Rights Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 08/23/2010 date Of Correction: 09/07/2010 |
Quality Care Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 11/16/2011 date Of Correction: 12/05/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 09/21/2010 date Of Correction: 10/15/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration. survey Date: 02/17/2010 date Of Correction: 03/31/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 10/30/2009 date Of Correction: 12/01/2009 |
||||
Deficiency #5 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life. survey Date: 10/30/2009 date Of Correction: 12/01/2009 |
Resident Assessment Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 11/16/2011 date Of Correction: 12/05/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Proper Discharge Planning And Communication, Of The Resident's Health Status And Summary Of The Resident's Stay. survey Date: 09/21/2010 date Of Correction: 10/15/2010 |
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors. survey Date: 10/03/2011 date Of Correction: 10/12/2011 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards. survey Date: 02/17/2010 date Of Correction: 03/31/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards. survey Date: 10/30/2009 date Of Correction: 12/01/2009 |
Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
11.1 % (13.99 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.09 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
0.8 % (32.15 % lower than average)
|
vs |
32.95 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
2.5 % (14.16 % lower than average)
|
vs |
16.66 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
8.3 % (4.28 % lower than average)
|
vs |
12.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
11.9 % (0.07 % higher than average)
|
vs |
11.83 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
10.8 % (4.83 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.63 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
7.1 % (6.36 % lower than average)
|
vs |
13.46 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
7 % (21.38 % lower than average)
|
vs |
28.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
|
vs |
43.68 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
17.2 % (7.82 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.02 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
84 % (0.64 % lower than average)
|
vs |
84.64 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
78.7 % (5.24 % lower than average)
|
vs |
83.94 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication | 2.6 / 3 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
|
vs |
15.52 %
|
Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
17.9 (64.2) % (7.49 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.39 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
0.7 % (23 % lower than average)
|
vs |
23.70 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
4.1 % (10 % lower than average)
|
vs |
14.10 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
6.9 % (2.32 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.22 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
12.4-2413.6-24 % (3.9 % higher than average)
|
vs |
8.50 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
10.6 % (0.05 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.65 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
8.8 % (0.78 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
5.2 % (14.66 % lower than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
|
vs |
38.53 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
75.2 % (64.47 % higher than average)
|
vs |
10.73 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain | 17.3:1 % | ||||
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
82.3 % (0.86 % higher than average)
|
vs |
81.44 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
79.9 % (5.15 % higher than average)
|
vs |
74.75 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication | 2.6 / 3 % |