VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > SHERWOOD OAKS HEALTH CENTER

SHERWOOD OAKS HEALTH CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
SHERWOOD OAKS HEALTH CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City FORT BRAGG   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have FORT BRAGG
State attribute explanation CA   vs 7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street 130 DANA STREET  
Zip Code 95437  
Phone 7079646333  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
79  (29.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
74  (17.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
94 % (10.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/25/2011  
Fire Survey Date 4/5/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 6  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
77  (14.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.43  (0.34 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.61  (0.23 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.04  (0.55 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1  (5.39 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1  (equals average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 03/25/2011
date Of Correction: 05/16/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 05/24/2012
date Of Correction: 06/23/2012 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 05/24/2012
date Of Correction: 06/23/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 05/23/2012
date Of Correction: 06/15/2012 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 05/24/2012
date Of Correction: 06/23/2012 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 05/24/2012
date Of Correction: 06/23/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.6 (65.5) % (6.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23 % (6.34 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.8 % (8.78 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10 % (1.83 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
55.9 % (11.36 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.1 % (12.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10 % (3.46 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.4 % (16.98 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
34.5 % (9.48 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
50 % (34.64 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
53.3 % (30.64 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9 % (12.62 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.5 % (6.89 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.1 % (11 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.1 % (5.12 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 11.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
63.5 % (20.12 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4 % (6.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 8.1 / 8.8 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.1 % (12.76 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3 % (7.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
38.1 % (13.34 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
52.2 % (29.24 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
59.3 % (15.45 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
5.3 % (12.04 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved