SHOREPOINTE NURSING CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	SAINT CLAIR SHORES	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have SAINT CLAIR SHORES
State attribute explanation	MI	vs	2.8% Nursing Homes USA have MI	compare MI Nursing Homes USA
Street	26001 EAST JEFFERSON AVENUE
Zip Code	48081
Phone	5867797000
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (3)
Number of Certified Beds	200 (91.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (200)
Total Number of Residents	175 (83.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (175)
Percent of Occupied Beds	88 % (4.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (88) %
Health Survey Date	3/16/2012
Fire Survey Date	3/16/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Partnership	vs	7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership	compare For profit - Partnership Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	1 (57.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	1 (55.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	18 (10.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	175 (83.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.66 (0.11 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	2.45 (1.61 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	3.11 (1.52 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.32 (5.17 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.32 (0.22 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 09/20/2010 date Of Correction: 10/29/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment. survey Date: 03/15/2010 date Of Correction: 04/02/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 09/29/2009 date Of Correction: 11/06/2009

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others. survey Date: 11/29/2011 date Of Correction: 12/09/2011

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 01/20/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 09/20/2010 date Of Correction: 10/29/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential. survey Date: 03/15/2010 date Of Correction: 04/02/2010

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So. survey Date: 02/23/2012 date Of Correction: 03/09/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 02/23/2012 date Of Correction: 03/09/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 04/21/2011 date Of Correction: 05/05/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 01/20/2011
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 09/20/2010 date Of Correction: 10/29/2010
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses. survey Date: 03/15/2010 date Of Correction: 04/02/2010
Deficiency #7		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 03/15/2010 date Of Correction: 04/02/2010
Deficiency #8		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 09/29/2009 date Of Correction: 11/06/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 02/23/2012 date Of Correction: 03/09/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That A Doctor Approves A Resident's Admission In Writing And That Each Resident Remains Under The Care Of A Doctor. survey Date: 11/18/2010 date Of Correction: 01/20/2011

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 09/20/2010 date Of Correction: 10/29/2010

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	8.9 / 9.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.6 % (31.35 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	16.4 % (0.26 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	7.7 % (4.88 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	17.7 % (5.87 % higher than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	1.1 % (14.53 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	2.5 % (10.96 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	4.4 % (23.98 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	9.5 % (15.52 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	90.6 % (5.96 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	87.4 % (3.46 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	2.1 % (43.8 % lower than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.1 % (14.42 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	9.5 % (15.89 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2 % (21.7 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	13.5 % (0.6 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	7.1 % (2.12 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	11.2-20 % (2.7 % higher than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	22.6 % (20.78 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	1.50 % (9.15 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	3.9 % (5.68 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	4.4 % (15.46 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.4 % (8.33 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	15.5 % (9.26 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	87.6 % (6.16 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	83.5 % (8.75 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	3.1 % (14.24 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %