VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > SHREVEPORT MANOR, LLC

SHREVEPORT MANOR, LLC

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
SHREVEPORT MANOR, LLC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City SHREVEPORT   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have SHREVEPORT
State attribute explanation LA   vs 1.8% Nursing Homes USA have LA
Street 3302 MANSFIELD ROAD  
Zip Code 71103  
Phone 3182229482  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
127  (18.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
107  (15.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
84 % (0.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/10/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/10/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
107  (15.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.34  (0.43 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.62  (0.22 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.96  (0.63 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (5.44 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 06/10/2010
date Of Correction: 07/26/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 10/16/2009
date Of Correction: 11/05/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 01/05/2012
date Of Correction: 01/27/2012 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Proper Treatment And Assistive Devices To Maintain Their Vision And Hearing.
survey Date: 06/10/2010
date Of Correction: 07/26/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 06/10/2010
date Of Correction: 07/26/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 10/16/2009
date Of Correction: 11/05/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Or Get Quality Lab Services/tests In A Timely Manner To Meet The Needs Of Residents.
survey Date: 01/05/2012
date Of Correction: 01/27/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs.
survey Date: 06/10/2010
date Of Correction: 07/26/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: At Least Once A Month, Have A Licensed Pharmacist Review Each Resident's Medication(s) And Report Any Irregularities To The Attending Doctor.
survey Date: 01/05/2012
date Of Correction: 01/27/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.7 % (3.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.5 % (10.16 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.8 % (5.78 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.5 % (1.33 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.1 % (20.44 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.2 % (10.43 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10.5 % (2.96 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.7 % (39.98 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (15.36 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (16.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.8 % (12.72 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.7 (69.3) % (4.69 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.8 % (22.9 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.3 % (8.8 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.8 % (2.42 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.6 % (0.9 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
29 % (14.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.5 % (6.15 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 8.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.7 % (19.16 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.2 % (35.33 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6 % (9.13 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7 % (17.76 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (18.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
16.4 % (58.35 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
18.4 % (1.06 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved