SILVER OAKS HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	NEW CASTLE	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have NEW CASTLE
State attribute explanation	PA	vs	4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA	compare PA Nursing Homes USA
Street	715 HARBOR STREET
Zip Code	16101
Phone	7246523863
Overall Star Rating	4 (0.89 higher than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (4)
Health Inspections Star Rating	2 (0.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (2)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	5 (1.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (5)
RN Only Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (4)
Number of Certified Beds	62 (46.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (62)
Total Number of Residents	53 (38.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (53)
Percent of Occupied Beds	85 % (1.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (85) %
Health Survey Date	1/6/2012
Fire Survey Date	1/11/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Partnership	vs	7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership	compare For profit - Partnership Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	Yes	vs	9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	11 (3.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	53 (38.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.92 (0.15 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.93 (0.09 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.84 (0.25 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.04 (5.45 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.04 (0.06 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 05/03/2012 date Of Correction: 06/11/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 10/18/2011 date Of Correction: 12/07/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment. survey Date: 10/18/2011 date Of Correction: 12/07/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public. survey Date: 05/04/2011 date Of Correction: 05/31/2011
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 10/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/16/2009
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment. survey Date: 09/04/2009 date Of Correction: 09/16/2009

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 05/15/2009 date Of Correction: 06/02/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 05/04/2011 date Of Correction: 05/31/2011

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 05/03/2012 date Of Correction: 06/11/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 08/12/2009 date Of Correction: 09/18/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 06/09/2009 date Of Correction: 06/29/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	57.9 % (32.81 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	75.2 % (58.54 % higher than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	9.8 % (2.03 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.2 % (11.43 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	5.9 % (7.56 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	5.9 % (9.62 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	62.1 % (36.71 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	75.2 % (61.1 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	2.3 % (6.92 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	7.1 % (1.4 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	44.8 % (1.42 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	3.6 % (7.05 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	9 % (0.58 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	0.7 % (19.16 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	10.9 % (0.17 % higher than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	7.9:1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	78.7 % (2.74 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	75 % (0.25 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %