VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > SONG HEALTH & REHAB OF COLUMBIA, LLC

SONG HEALTH & REHAB OF COLUMBIA, LLC

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
SONG HEALTH & REHAB OF COLUMBIA, LLC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City COLUMBIA   vs 0.2% Nursing Homes USA have COLUMBIA
State attribute explanation MS   vs 1.3% Nursing Homes USA have MS
Street 1506 NORTH MAIN STREET  
Zip Code 39429  
Phone 6017369557  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
119  (10.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
103  (11.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
87 % (3.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/1/2012  
Fire Survey Date 2/28/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Limited Liability Company  vs 1.1% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Limited liability company
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
103  (11.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.52  (0.25 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.77  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.3  (0.29 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (5.47 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (0.08 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/12/2010
date Of Correction: 02/05/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 11/04/2010
date Of Correction: 12/06/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 01/12/2010
date Of Correction: 02/05/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 06/18/2010
date Of Correction: 07/16/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 06/18/2010
date Of Correction: 07/16/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.
survey Date: 06/18/2010
date Of Correction: 07/16/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
35.8 % (10.71 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.7 % (30.25 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.6 % (7.94 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
11.3 % (1.28 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 10.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
38.5 % (6.04 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.9 % (8.73 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.6 % (5.86 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.20 % (41.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
40.9 % (15.88 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
47.8 % (36.84 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
39.6 % (44.34 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.2 % (12.32 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
34.4 % (9.01 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.1 % (20.6 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22.7 (72.9) % (8.6 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
12.7 % (3.48 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.9 (55.2) % (4.4 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
36.1 % (7.28 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.8 % (3.85 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.2 % (1.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.4 % (14.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.5 % (36.03 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1 % (8.63 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
55.6 % (30.84 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
46.3 % (35.14 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 23.8:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
5.3 % (12.04 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved