VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > SONGBIRD LODGE

SONGBIRD LODGE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
SONGBIRD LODGE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City BROWNWOOD   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have BROWNWOOD
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 2500 SONGBIRD CIR  
Zip Code 76801  
Phone 3256464750  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

Number of Certified Beds
125  (16.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
96  (4.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
77 % (6.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 10/28/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/8/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(6.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
96  (4.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs.
survey Date: 10/28/2011
date Of Correction: 12/06/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.6 % (2.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2 % (30.95 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.6 % (2.06 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.4 % (7.18 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11 % (0.83 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40 % (4.54 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder 7.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11 % (2.46 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.8 % (21.58 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
29.2 % (4.18 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
62.5 % (22.14 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
61 % (22.94 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.3 % (13.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.7 (74.7) % (1.69 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.3 % (22.4 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
17.2 % (3.1 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.1 % (6.12 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.9 % (1.6 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
37.6 % (5.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.7 % (2.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.7 % (0.12 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
15.6 % (4.26 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7 % (8.03 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
32.3 % (7.54 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
67.6 % (13.84 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
66.7 % (8.05 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.9 % (14.44 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved