VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > SOUTHLAND REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER

SOUTHLAND REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
SOUTHLAND REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City LUFKIN   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have LUFKIN
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 501 N MEDFORD DR  
Zip Code 75901  
Phone 9366391252  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
150  (41.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
98  (6.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
65 % (18.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 7/20/2011  
Fire Survey Date 7/21/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
98  (6.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.74  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.74  (0.1 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.48  (0.11 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (5.43 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 03/23/2010
date Of Correction: 04/16/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely.
survey Date: 03/23/2010
date Of Correction: 04/16/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 01/11/2012
date Of Correction: 01/31/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 01/11/2012
date Of Correction: 01/31/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 12/16/2010
date Of Correction: 01/14/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 12/16/2010
date Of Correction: 01/14/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
31.8 % (6.71 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.2 % (31.75 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
19 % (2.34 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9 % (3.58 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (63.37 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40 % (4.54 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.20 % (13.43 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.1 % (9.36 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
27.2 % (1.18 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.1 % (39.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
50 % (24.98 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.1 % (8.46 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.1 % (9.16 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.1 % (8.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.3 % (4.91 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.8 % (22.9 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.4 % (7.3 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.3 % (3.92 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.20 % (6.3 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
43.6 % (0.22 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.2 % (9.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.4 % (1.18 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 19.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.9 % (34.63 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.8 % (3.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
40.9 % (16.14 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.6 % (11.16 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
92.7 % (17.95 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
12.7 % (4.64 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved