VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > SOUTHWIND NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER

SOUTHWIND NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
SOUTHWIND NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City CROWLEY   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have CROWLEY
State attribute explanation LA   vs 1.8% Nursing Homes USA have LA
Street 804 CROWLEY-RAYNE HWY  
Zip Code 70526  
Phone 3377832740  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
99  (9.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
107  (15.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
108 % (24.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/17/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/17/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(56.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(54.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
107  (15.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.27  (0.5 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.7  (0.14 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.97  (0.62 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (5.43 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 01/26/2011
date Of Correction: 02/28/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 01/26/2011
date Of Correction: 02/28/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 04/29/2010
date Of Correction: 06/10/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 01/26/2011
date Of Correction: 02/28/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 04/29/2010
date Of Correction: 06/10/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 04/29/2010
date Of Correction: 06/10/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.1 % (3.01 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.5 % (30.45 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.3 % (15.36 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
11.1 % (1.48 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.5 % (0.33 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.7 % (9.84 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.4 % (12.23 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.3 % (5.16 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1 % (42.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.5 % (18.52 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (15.36 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (16.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2 % (13.52 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.8 % (0.41 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.1 % (20.6 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.4 % (12.7 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.3 % (0.2 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
37.8 % (5.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.5 % (7.15 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
14 % (4.42 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.7 % (36.83 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.8 % (6.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 10.1:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.4 % (16.96 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.6 % (23.85 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved