SPRING CREEK HEALTHCARE CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	HOLLADAY	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have HOLLADAY
State attribute explanation	UT	vs	0.6% Nursing Homes USA have UT	compare UT Nursing Homes USA
Street	4600 SOUTH HIGHLAND DRIVE
Zip Code	84117
Phone	8012721892
Overall Star Rating	3 (0.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (3)
Health Inspections Star Rating	2 (0.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (2)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	2 (1.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (2)
RN Only Star Rating	5 (1.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (5)
Number of Certified Beds	100 (8.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (100)
Total Number of Residents	52 (39.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (52)
Percent of Occupied Beds	52 % (31.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (52) %
Health Survey Date	1/12/2012
Fire Survey Date	1/10/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	2 (56.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	2 (54.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	6 (1.48 lower than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	52 (39.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.41 (0.64 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.21 (0.63 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.62 (0.03 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.16 (5.33 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.16 (0.06 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Give Each Resident A Notice Of Rights, Rules, Services And Charges. Tell Each Resident Who Can Get Medicaid Benefits About 1) Which Items And Services Medicaid Covers And Which The Resident Must Pay For. survey Date: 03/25/2010 date Of Correction: 05/11/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 07/08/2009 date Of Correction: 08/10/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 03/25/2010 date Of Correction: 05/11/2010

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 03/25/2010 date Of Correction: 05/11/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional. survey Date: 03/25/2010 date Of Correction: 05/11/2010

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Or Get X-rays And Other Tests In A Timely Manner To Meet The Needs Of Residents. survey Date: 03/25/2010 date Of Correction: 05/11/2010

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	20 % (5.09 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.8 % (31.15 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	3 % (9.58 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	5.3 % (6.53 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	5.8 % (9.83 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	15.8 % (2.34 % higher than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	13.5 % (14.88 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	2.7 % (40.98 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	55.2 % (30.18 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	82.4 % (2.24 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	87.4 % (3.46 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	2.8 % (43.1 % lower than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	20.4 % (4.99 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.1 % (22.6 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	32.4 (90.3) % (18.3 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	5.1 % (4.12 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	3.9 % (4.6 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	35 % (8.38 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	8.3 % (2.35 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	16.3:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	9.2 % (10.66 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	0.9 % (37.63 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	75.2 % (64.47 % higher than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	33.6 % (8.84 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	80.3 % (1.14 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	87.3 % (12.55 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	14 % (3.34 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %