VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > SPRING VIEW MANOR

SPRING VIEW MANOR

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
SPRING VIEW MANOR VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City CONWAY SPRINGS   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have CONWAY SPRINGS
State attribute explanation KS   vs 2.2% Nursing Homes USA have KS
Street 412 S 8TH  
Zip Code 67031  
Phone 6204562285  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
45  (63.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
44  (47.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
98 % (14.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/6/2011  
Fire Survey Date 4/18/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Individual  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Individual
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
13  (5.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
44  (47.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.39  (0.38 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.4  (0.44 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.79  (0.8 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (5.45 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 05/27/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/27/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Hold, Secure And Manage Each Resident's Personal Money Which Is Deposited With The Nursing Home.
survey Date: 05/27/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 05/27/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 05/27/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 05/27/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 05/27/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Activities To Meet The Interests And Needs Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 05/27/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 05/27/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 05/27/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 05/27/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 05/27/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 05/27/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.4 % (9.69 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.4-2413.6-24 % (4.26 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.8 % (12.83 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.7 % (5.76 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.7 % (20.68 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.1 % (10.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.2 % (9.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.1 % (1 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.3 % (5.92 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.7 % (6.8 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
51.2 % (7.82 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.3 % (7.35 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.5 % (0.08 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.1 % (14.76 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
9.2 % (1.53 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13 % (11.76 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
70.8 % (10.64 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (25.25 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %



Scroll To Top

saved