VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > SPRINGS AT THE WATERMARK, THE

SPRINGS AT THE WATERMARK, THE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
SPRINGS AT THE WATERMARK, THE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Philadelphia  vs 0.3% Nursing Homes USA have Philadelphia
State attribute explanation PA   vs 4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA
Street 2 FRANKLIN TOWN BLVD  
Zip Code 19103  
Phone 2155631800  
Overall Star Rating
(1.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
109  (0.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
98  (6.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
90 % (6.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 1/30/2012  
Fire Survey Date 1/12/2012  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(3.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
98  (6.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.06  (0.29 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.82  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.89  (0.3 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.13  (5.36 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.13  (0.03 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 12/16/2010
date Of Correction: 01/05/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 12/16/2010
date Of Correction: 01/05/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 05/05/2010
date Of Correction: 06/01/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 09/27/2011
date Of Correction: 10/21/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8 % (17.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.1 % (30.85 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (58.54 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.3 % (10.28 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (63.37 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
70.5 % (25.96 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.8 % (11.83 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.6 % (9.86 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (50.18 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
52.9 % (31.74 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
53 % (30.94 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.3 % (44.6 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.7 % (15.69 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.1 % (21.6 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (61.1 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.4 % (4.82 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.9 % (6.6 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
72.9 % (29.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.7 % (7.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.2 % (9.53 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.4 % (23.36 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
55.3 % (26.14 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
62.2 % (12.55 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.1 % (16.24 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved