VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > ST JOHNSBURY HEALTH & REHAB

ST JOHNSBURY HEALTH & REHAB

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
ST JOHNSBURY HEALTH & REHAB VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City SAINT JOHNSBURY   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have SAINT JOHNSBURY
State attribute explanation VT   vs 0.2% Nursing Homes USA have VT
Street 1248 HOSPITAL DRIVE  
Zip Code 5819  
Phone 8027488757  
Overall Star Rating
(1.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
110  (1.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
87  (4.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
79 % (4.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 4/18/2012  
Fire Survey Date 4/18/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
18  (10.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
87  (4.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.64  (0.13 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.88  (0.04 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.52  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.25  (5.24 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.25  (0.15 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 07/15/2009
date Of Correction: 08/06/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/06/2009
date Of Correction: 05/28/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 08/19/2009
date Of Correction: 09/02/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Drugs That Restrain Them, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.
survey Date: 05/06/2009
date Of Correction: 05/28/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 03/14/2012
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 03/17/2010
date Of Correction: 04/05/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Has The Right To Have A Choice Over Activities, Their Schedules And Health Care According To His Or Her Interests, Assessment, And Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 10/20/2009
date Of Correction: 11/09/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Determine If It Is Safe For The Resident To Self-administer Drugs.
survey Date: 10/20/2009
date Of Correction: 11/09/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 03/14/2012
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 10/20/2009
date Of Correction: 11/09/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 08/19/2009
date Of Correction: 09/02/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 06/22/2009
date Of Correction: 09/02/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 10/20/2009
date Of Correction: 11/09/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 03/14/2012
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Post Nurse Staffing Information/data On A Daily Basis.
survey Date: 03/14/2012
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 06/22/2009
date Of Correction: 07/09/2009 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 10/20/2009
date Of Correction: 11/09/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.
survey Date: 05/06/2009
date Of Correction: 05/28/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.9 (55.2) % (12.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1 % (31.95 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.8 % (14.86 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.9 % (10.68 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.4 % (7.43 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.5 % (8.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.3 % (9.16 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.7 % (22.32 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.2 % (3.56 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
85.3 % (1.36 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.1 % (42.8 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4 % (14.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.7 % (11.69 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.3 % (21.4 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3 % (11.1 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.6 % (5.62 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9 % (0.5 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
56.1 % (12.72 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.6 % (4.05 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.2 % (5.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.5 - 2.0 % (38.03 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.3 % (8.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.3 % (18.46 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.2 % (6.76 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
79.8 % (5.05 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.3 % (15.04 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved