VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > STONEBROOK MANOR AT BROADWAY

STONEBROOK MANOR AT BROADWAY

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
STONEBROOK MANOR AT BROADWAY VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City SAN ANTONIO   vs 0.4% Nursing Homes USA have SAN ANTONIO
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 1841 FLAMINGO  
Zip Code 78209  
Phone 2108245324  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
86  (22.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
85  (6.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
99 % (15.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/9/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/10/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
13  (5.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
85  (6.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.39  (0.38 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.07  (0.23 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.46  (0.13 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
75.2  (69.71 higher than average)
vs
5.49

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely.
survey Date: 03/26/2012
date Of Correction: 04/17/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 02/25/2011
date Of Correction: 03/25/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That A Working Call System Is Available In Each Resident's Room Or Bathroom And Bathing Area.
survey Date: 02/25/2011
date Of Correction: 03/25/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 02/25/2011
date Of Correction: 03/25/2011 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 12/15/2009
date Of Correction: 02/15/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible.
survey Date: 03/26/2012
date Of Correction: 04/17/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 03/26/2012
date Of Correction: 04/17/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 03/26/2012
date Of Correction: 04/17/2012 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 01/11/2012
date Of Correction: 02/03/2012 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 01/11/2012
date Of Correction: 01/12/2012 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 01/11/2012
date Of Correction: 02/15/2012 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 03/26/2012
date Of Correction: 04/17/2012 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 12/15/2009
date Of Correction: 12/16/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
64.5 % (39.41 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.5 % (28.45 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.5 % (12.16 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.20 % (10.38 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 14.7:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
64.9 % (36.52 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.9 % (6.26 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.9 % (9.96 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
9.1 % (6.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
64.7 % (39.31 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.9 % (20.8 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.9 % (9.2 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.5 % (5.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.6 % (2.1 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40 % (3.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.9 % (8.75 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.3 % (8.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
68.2 % (48.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.9 % (3.83 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.5 % (20.26 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
72.8 % (8.64 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
26.4 % (48.35 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
12.5 % (4.84 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved