VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > STONEHENGE OF RICHFIELD

STONEHENGE OF RICHFIELD

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
STONEHENGE OF RICHFIELD VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City RICHFIELD   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have RICHFIELD
State attribute explanation UT   vs 0.6% Nursing Homes USA have UT
Street 125 EAST 600 NORTH  
Zip Code 84701  
Number of Certified Beds
30  (78.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
15  (76.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
50 % (33.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 6/7/2012  
Fire Survey Date 6/7/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Staff Information
Number of Residents
15  (76.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.36  (1.59 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.13  (0.29 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
3.48  (1.89 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.8  (4.69 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.8  (0.7 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
35.9 % (10.88 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.8 % (14.16 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
1 % (82.94 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.4 % (44.5 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the pneumococcal vaccine
96.8 % (16.73 % higher than average)
vs
80.07 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the pneumococcal vaccine
96.7 % (18.08 % higher than average)
vs
78.62 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
34.2 % (9.44 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.6 % (17.16 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
0.8 % (73.95 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.50 % (15.84 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved