VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > STONEHILL CARE CENTER

STONEHILL CARE CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
STONEHILL CARE CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 75.2 % 
City DUBUQUE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have DUBUQUE
State attribute explanation IA   vs 2.7% Nursing Homes USA have IA
Street 3485 WINDSOR AVENUE  
Zip Code 52001  
Phone 5635577180  
Overall Star Rating
(1.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
177  (68.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
171  (79.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
97 % (13.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 10/7/2011  
Fire Survey Date 10/12/2011  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
16  (8.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
171  (79.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.97  (0.2 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.26  (0.58 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.23  (0.36 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (5.44 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/12/2012
date Of Correction: 01/26/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 07/17/2009
date Of Correction: 08/14/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 07/17/2009
date Of Correction: 08/14/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 06/18/2009
date Of Correction: 07/10/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 03/17/2010
date Of Correction: 04/17/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 05/14/2009
date Of Correction: 06/10/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Has The Right To Have A Choice Over Activities, Their Schedules And Health Care According To His Or Her Interests, Assessment, And Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 08/12/2010
date Of Correction: 08/24/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 01/20/2010
date Of Correction: 02/05/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies And Procedures For Influenza And Pneumococcal Immunizations.
survey Date: 07/17/2009
date Of Correction: 08/14/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 07/17/2009
date Of Correction: 08/14/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 07/17/2009
date Of Correction: 08/14/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 06/18/2009
date Of Correction: 07/10/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Doctors Visit Residents Regularly, As Required.
survey Date: 07/17/2009
date Of Correction: 08/14/2009 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep The Rate Of Medication Errors (wrong Drug, Wrong Dose, Wrong Time) To Less Than 5%.
survey Date: 07/17/2009
date Of Correction: 08/14/2009 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 07/17/2009
date Of Correction: 08/14/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Special Eating Equipment And Utensils For Each Resident Who Needs Them.
survey Date: 07/17/2009
date Of Correction: 08/14/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18 % (7.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.5 % (8.16 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
0.8 % (11.78 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.3 % (10.53 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
60.9 % (16.36 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.5 % (13.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.3 % (23.08 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
29.4 % (4.38 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.2 % (9.56 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95.2 % (11.26 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.5 % (9.02 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.9 (64.2) % (7.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.7 % (5.4 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
0.8 % (8.42 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.20 % (6.3 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
57.7 % (14.32 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2 % (8.65 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5 % (4.58 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5 % (14.86 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.4 % (4.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22.8 % (1.96 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.9 % (11.46 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.5 % (21.75 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.5 % (12.84 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved