Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
SUTTON PARK CTR NURSING REHAB | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
Staff Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Residents |
147 (55.62 higher than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.54 (0.23 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.77
|
||
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.72 (0.12 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.84
|
||
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.26 (0.33 lower than average)
|
vs |
1.59
|
||
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.11 (5.38 lower than average)
|
vs |
5.49
|
||
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.11 (0.01 higher than average)
|
vs |
0.10
|
Environmental Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 01/19/2010 date Of Correction: 02/28/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services. survey Date: 06/10/2009 date Of Correction: 06/19/2009 |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 01/19/2010 date Of Correction: 02/28/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services. survey Date: 06/10/2009 date Of Correction: 06/19/2009 |
||||
Deficiency #5 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 01/19/2010 date Of Correction: 02/28/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #6 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services. survey Date: 06/10/2009 date Of Correction: 06/19/2009 |
Quality Care Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 11/09/2010 date Of Correction: 12/15/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 01/19/2010 date Of Correction: 02/28/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 01/19/2010 date Of Correction: 02/28/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 06/18/2009 date Of Correction: 07/08/2009 |
||||
Deficiency #5 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 11/09/2010 date Of Correction: 12/15/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #6 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 01/19/2010 date Of Correction: 02/28/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #7 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 01/19/2010 date Of Correction: 02/28/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #8 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 06/18/2009 date Of Correction: 07/08/2009 |
||||
Deficiency #9 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 11/09/2010 date Of Correction: 12/15/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #10 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 01/19/2010 date Of Correction: 02/28/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #11 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 01/19/2010 date Of Correction: 02/28/2010 |
||||
Deficiency #12 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 06/18/2009 date Of Correction: 07/08/2009 |
Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
18.4 % (6.69 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.09 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
1.6 % (31.35 % lower than average)
|
vs |
32.95 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
3.4 % (13.26 % lower than average)
|
vs |
16.66 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers | 12.3:1 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
5.1 % (6.73 % lower than average)
|
vs |
11.83 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
17.5 % (27.04 % lower than average)
|
vs |
44.54 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
3.6 % (12.03 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.63 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
5.1 % (8.36 % lower than average)
|
vs |
13.46 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
|
vs |
28.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
|
vs |
43.68 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain | 18.2:1 % | ||||
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
67.6 % (17.04 % lower than average)
|
vs |
84.64 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
70 % (13.94 % lower than average)
|
vs |
83.94 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
1 (44.9 lower than average)
|
vs |
45.90
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
0.7 % (14.82 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.52 %
|
Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
20.3 % (5.09 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.39 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
2.5 % (21.2 % lower than average)
|
vs |
23.70 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
4.1 % (10 % lower than average)
|
vs |
14.10 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
9.2 % (0.02 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.22 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
3.8 % (4.7 % lower than average)
|
vs |
8.50 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
16.7 % (26.68 % lower than average)
|
vs |
43.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
4.5 % (6.15 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.65 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
6.8 % (2.78 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
|
vs |
38.53 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
0.5 - 2.0 % (10.23 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.73 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
22.1 (71.8) % (2.66 % lower than average)
|
vs |
24.76 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
54.3 % (27.14 % lower than average)
|
vs |
81.44 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
81.1 % (6.35 % higher than average)
|
vs |
74.75 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
17.9 (64.2) % (0.56 % higher than average)
|
vs |
17.34 %
|