SWANSEA REHAB HEALTH CARE | comparical.com

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

SWANSEA REHAB HEALTH CARE

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	SWANSEA	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have SWANSEA
State attribute explanation	IL	vs	5% Nursing Homes USA have IL	compare IL Nursing Homes USA
Street	1405 NORTH SECOND STREET
Zip Code	62226
Phone	6182336625
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (2)
Quality Measures Star Rating	1 (2.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (1)
RN Only Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (2)
Number of Certified Beds	94 (14.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (94)
Total Number of Residents	65 (26.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (65)
Percent of Occupied Beds	69 % (14.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (69) %
Health Survey Date	11/8/2011
Fire Survey Date	12/14/2011
Sprinkler Status	Not Sprinklered	vs	1.1% Nursing Homes USA have Not Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	19 (11.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	65 (26.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.49 (0.28 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.49 (0.35 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.98 (0.61 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.03 (5.46 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.03 (0.07 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public. survey Date: 05/20/2011 date Of Correction: 06/23/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services. survey Date: 05/20/2011 date Of Correction: 06/23/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 05/11/2011 date Of Correction: 05/11/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 01/12/2011 date Of Correction: 02/07/2011

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 07/28/2011 date Of Correction: 08/10/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 07/28/2011 date Of Correction: 08/10/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 04/22/2010 date Of Correction: 04/23/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 04/22/2010 date Of Correction: 04/23/2010

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident. survey Date: 01/12/2011 date Of Correction: 02/07/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 01/12/2011 date Of Correction: 02/07/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident. survey Date: 09/17/2010 date Of Correction: 10/06/2010

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 11/08/2011 date Of Correction: 12/14/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life. survey Date: 07/28/2011 date Of Correction: 08/01/2011

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 03/08/2012 date Of Correction: 03/13/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 08/23/2011 date Of Correction: 09/20/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 08/23/2011 date Of Correction: 09/09/2011

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 08/23/2011 date Of Correction: 09/09/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors. survey Date: 08/23/2011 date Of Correction: 09/09/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors. survey Date: 01/12/2011 date Of Correction: 02/07/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	29.3 % (4.21 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	4.3 % (28.65 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	9 % (7.66 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	3.8 % (8.03 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	10.4 % (5.23 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	13.5 % (0.04 % higher than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	22 % (6.38 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	13.2 % (30.48 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	47.1 % (37.54 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	61.8 % (22.14 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	7.5 % (8.02 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	33.3 % (7.91 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	4 % (19.7 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	11.2-20 % (2.9 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	6 % (3.22 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	3.7 % (4.8 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	27.5 % (15.88 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	8.7 % (1.95 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	11.2-20 % (1.62 % higher than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	27.2 % (7.34 % higher than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	11.2-20 % (27.33 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	5.6:1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	24.6 % (0.16 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	52.3 % (29.14 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	62.2 % (12.55 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	4.3 % (13.04 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %